UCS Critical Reflection
At the
start of this module, my primary goals were to make more informed and rational
decisions through critical thinking, and to embrace the processes of learning,
unlearning, and relearning. Overall, I believe I made significant progress
toward achieving these goals, although there is still room for
improvement. For the reader’s response report, where I wrote about
Porsche’s engine, I was deeply passionate about the topic—perhaps too
passionate. I ended up writing the report the way I wanted it to be and how I
thought it should be, which caused me to stray from the actual requirements of
the task. This experience ties closely to the concepts of unlearning and
relearning. I need to recognize and unlearn the tendency to let enthusiasm
overshadow focus. Passion for a subject is important, but if the energy and
effort are not directed appropriately, the results may not reflect the effort
invested. I’ve also
realized that everyone’s ideal outcome differs. The goal isn’t to achieve
perfection but to learn to be adaptable and accommodative. Striving for
perfection can sometimes be counterproductive, even toxic, and can strain
relationships. This is closely tied to communication—not just in group
projects, but in life overall. Additionally, I recognize the need to
improve my presentation skills. I tend to experience stage fright, but I found
that practicing and conducting mock presentations helped reduce my anxiety,
which was a strategy I used before the actual presentation. Finally, I’ve
come to see critical thinking as more than just a skill—it’s a lifestyle and a
conscious choice. How you approach anything reflects how you approach
everything, and critical thinking can be applied to every aspect of life.
Reflecting on our research project focused
on the smart suspension system for e-mountain bikes, I gained valuable insights
into teamwork and collaborative learning. Initially, we struggled with
delegating tasks, as differing perspectives and varied levels of background
knowledge, including personal experience with mountain biking, influenced how
we approached the project. These differences initially made it challenging to
align on a cohesive plan. However, we learned to trust each other’s strengths,
enabling us to take on sections of the report where we felt most confident.
This trust-building improved our efficiency and reduced tension within the
group. A major focus for us was ensuring the report flowed cohesively, as
having four distinct writers with unique styles posed a challenge. Through
careful observation of each other’s work and open communication, we aligned our
contributions to create a unified document. I realized that effective teamwork
depends heavily on clear communication and constructive feedback, which became
vital in resolving issues and improving the overall quality of our work. This
project also underscored the iterative nature of learning—embracing trial and
error as essential steps to progress while accepting that perfection is unlikely
in the first draft. Moving forward, I will apply these lessons in academic and
professional settings, emphasizing empathy, clear communication, and openness
to feedback. This experience fundamentally shifted my perspective on learning,
demonstrating that collaboration not only enhances individual growth but is
also critical for addressing complex, real-world challenges effectively.
Comments
Post a Comment